Should the NHS pay for IVF treatments?
Currently couples who struggle to have children may be able to get up to three cycles of IVF treatment on the NHS. Yet some regions are discussing cutting that to one cycle or even stopping it altogether.
Should the NHS fund IVF treatments – which of these is closest to your opinion?
Currently couples who struggle to have children may be able to get up to three cycles of IVF treatment on the NHS. Yet some regions are discussing cutting that to one cycle or even stopping it altogether.
Should the NHS fund IVF treatments – which of these is closest to your opinion?
Results
I’m male, single, no children (1230 votes)
|
|
|
| Yes the NHS should fund it up to three cycles |  | 142 votes (12%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it but only for one cycle |  | 63 votes (5%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it, up to three cycles, but only for a first child |  | 335 votes (27%) |
| No it shouldn’t be funded – except in extreme cases |  | 254 votes (21%) |
| No it shouldn’t ever be funded |  | 436 votes (35%) |
I’m female, single, no children (2079 votes)
|
|
|
| Yes the NHS should fund it up to three cycles |  | 358 votes (17%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it but only for one cycle |  | 99 votes (5%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it, up to three cycles, but only for a first child |  | 720 votes (35%) |
| No it shouldn’t be funded – except in extreme cases |  | 347 votes (17%) |
| No it shouldn’t ever be funded |  | 555 votes (27%) |
I’m male, in a couple, no children (1477 votes)
|
|
|
| Yes the NHS should fund it up to three cycles |  | 292 votes (20%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it but only for one cycle |  | 57 votes (4%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it, up to three cycles, but only for a first child |  | 399 votes (27%) |
| No it shouldn’t be funded – except in extreme cases |  | 254 votes (17%) |
| No it shouldn’t ever be funded |  | 475 votes (32%) |
I’m female, in a couple, no children (4003 votes)
|
|
|
| Yes the NHS should fund it up to three cycles |  | 1188 votes (30%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it but only for one cycle |  | 181 votes (5%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it, up to three cycles, but only for a first child |  | 1307 votes (33%) |
| No it shouldn’t be funded – except in extreme cases |  | 529 votes (13%) |
| No it shouldn’t ever be funded |  | 798 votes (20%) |
I’m male, with children (3750 votes)
|
|
|
| Yes the NHS should fund it up to three cycles |  | 493 votes (13%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it but only for one cycle |  | 180 votes (5%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it, up to three cycles, but only for a first child |  | 1105 votes (29%) |
| No it shouldn’t be funded – except in extreme cases |  | 828 votes (22%) |
| No it shouldn’t ever be funded |  | 1144 votes (31%) |
I’m female, with children (9640 votes)
|
|
|
| Yes the NHS should fund it up to three cycles |  | 2337 votes (24%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it but only for one cycle |  | 675 votes (7%) |
| Yes the NHS should fund it, up to three cycles, but only for a first child |  | 3673 votes (38%) |
| No it shouldn’t be funded – except in extreme cases |  | 1545 votes (16%) |
| No it shouldn’t ever be funded |  | 1410 votes (15%) |
22,179 votes received.
We try to use technology to limit voting to one per person. Occasionally, this may erroneously block a few people's votes (eg, from shared offices). Apologies for that.