-
More on this topic
Visa, Mastercard & Amex chargeback
There's valuable hidden protection on credit, debit and charge cards called 'chargeback'. If…
Consumer rights
Ever returned poor or faulty goods for the shop to simply dismiss your complaint? Now imagine…
Administration help
Many retailers and other firms have sadly been struggling to stay afloat since the beginning…
MSE weekly email
FREE weekly MoneySaving email
For all the latest deals, guides and loopholes simply sign up today – it's spam-free!
Section 75 refunds
Free protection for credit card spending on items over £100
Updated 17 January 2022
Your secret financial superhero: Section 75 laws mean your credit card provider must protect purchases over £100 for free, meaning you could get your money back if there's a problem. It's taken on more importance these days with coronavirus leading to a spate of travel cancellations – it's vital to know where you stand. This guide takes you through your legal rights.
Affected by coronavirus holiday cancellations? Why there might be a better option to try before using Section 75
Coronavirus has meant many people have faced holiday cancellations and battles to get their money back. If you qualify for a chargeback AND Section 75 claim, but are unsure which to try first, consider this from MSE founder Martin Lewis:
"Even if you actually have a credit card and qualify for Section 75, I wouldn't ask for that at this stage. I would ask for a chargeback. That's because under the chargeback process, which is part of the Visa, Mastercard and Amex rules, your bank is asking for money back from the holiday firm's bank, which your bank is unlikely to have an issue doing."
For more on your holiday refund rights, see our Coronavirus Travel Rights guide.
MSE weekly email
FREE weekly MoneySaving email
For all the latest deals, guides and loopholes simply sign up today – it's spam-free!
What is Section 75?
Section 75 is an important UK consumer protection law made in the 1970s that means your credit provider must take the same responsibility as the retailer if things go wrong with a purchase. Yet it doesn't work on all purchases – just those costing a certain amount:
Pay for something on a credit card over £100 and up to £30,000 and the provider's equally liable if something goes wrong.
This isn't the credit provider being nice. It's a legal protection put in place so that you're never in the position of paying off debt for something you didn't receive or wasn't as it should've been. Whether it's a flight, kitchen, computer or anything else, pay on a credit card, store card or with store instalment credit, and the credit provider's responsible too.
If you've yet to own a credit card or simply don't know how they work, see our Credit cards explained guide.
The law behind Section 75
75. — (1) If the debtor under a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement falling within section 12(b) or (c) has, in relation to a transaction financed by the agreement, any claim against the supplier in respect of a misrepresentation or breach of contract, he shall have a like claim against the creditor, who, with the supplier, shall accordingly be jointly and severally liable to the debtor.
Section 75 does work – hear from people who have tried it...
One MoneySaver paid the deposit for their car by credit card, and got a full refund using Section 75 when the trader went bust.
I ordered and paid £15,991 in full for a new car but before I took delivery, the trader went into liquidation.
Thankfully I had paid the first £100 deposit on my Barclaycard credit card. So I made a Section 75 claim. It took six months, but this week I received a credit to my card of the whole amount, just from having paid the first £100 on my card.
And here's a success story that ended up with the ombudsman and proves persistence pays off.
MoneySaver Linda and her husband had bought a £22,400 kitchen, and following this guide paid £200 as a deposit on a credit card for extra protection. The firm went bust so they asked the card firm for all the cash back – as they were due – but it said no.
Linda went to the Financial Ombudsman. It ordered the card provider to pay out the full whack, plus 8% statutory interest, plus £200 extra for "inconvenience caused". For inspiration see Linda's full "I got £23k back" story.
Martin's always said to keep going with a claim. Tesco tried to say the name of the business owner was different to his real name so it wasn't the same person. But I kept going back on MoneySavingExpert and reading about Section 75 and I kept thinking, 'don't give up, keep going, keep fighting' as I knew we were right.
But when we heard the adjudicator had found in our favour, I burst into tears. I just couldn't believe it. Although at times we felt like giving up, I was so convinced we were right having re-read the information on this site and even quoting a case you had on here, that I kept going.
What does Section 75 cover?
Section 75 is fantastic protection – if you order something and the retailer goes kaput, you can still claim your money back from the credit card provider (even if you've since closed your credit card account).
Section 75 applies to most, but not all, credit card agreements. Credit cards are the main area covered, but the law also applies to store cards, store instalment credit and some car finance agreements (but NOT hire purchase).
Plus, even if the problem is just non-delivery or faulty goods, you have exactly the same rights from the credit provider as from the retailer, flight company or supplier. If your goods are faulty, first check the warranty, as if it's with the manufacturer rather than the retailer, you might not be able to use Section 75, see below.
Here are some examples for when you can use it:
- You order expensive jewellery from overseas that never arrives
- You buy flights direct from an airline that goes bust
- You buy a radio from a shop, and find it's faulty
In all of these, your lender is jointly liable for a refund.
So if you're buying something or ordering tickets or flights worth more than £100, pay for some or all of it on a credit card to ensure you're protected. Keep your receipts and card statement to make it easier.
If you discover a problem with a product you bought using a credit card (and it meets the requirements in terms of minimum amount, debtor/creditor supply link etc) then, even if the account is closed, the provider would still be liable and would need to refund you.
Three need-to-knows
- You must have direct links with the creditor and supplier to be able to use Section 75. Technically there must be a direct link between the debtor (that's you, the customer), the creditor (the credit card company – for example, American Express, Lloyds, Barclaycard) and the supplier (the retailer selling you the goods or service).
If that relationship is deemed to be broken by the involvement of an intermediary or third party, Section 75 protection WON'T apply. Unfortunately though, even the Financial Ombudsman Service – which arbitrates Section 75 disputes – is unable to provide clear guidance on when this happens, leaving shoppers in the dark.
- If your problem is with faulty goods, first check the warranty instead of using Section 75. If you paid for a product using your card and discover a problem with it while it is still under warranty, and the warranty is with the manufacturer, you may not be able to bring a Section 75 claim for breach of contract.
This is because the contract at the point of sale is with the retailer or supplier and therefore the creditor-debtor-supplier link would be broken. However, you would be able to make a claim if the warranty is with the retailer or supplier directly as the chain would still be intact.
- The law states the item must be more than £100 to be covered by Section 75, but this is not always clear cut. This is where it gets quite tricky. The law is plain; the £100 threshold is for the cash value of a 'single item' (so excluding any fees, and charges such as delivery). Yet single items aren't always straightforward.
- Fly to Traveltown with Holidayair on flights costing £99 outbound and £9.99 back, and while it's over £100 in total, as no single ticket was over £100, you're not protected. Yet if Holidayair had only sold return journeys and you bought a specific £109 return ticket, then you'd be covered.
- Alternatively, if a suit jacket and trousers are individually priced at £60 each, you're not covered, but if you buy the suit as a whole for one price of £120, you are covered.
- If a camera cost exactly £100 and its lens case was £45, neither item is more than £100, so neither is covered.
This can get more complicated though. If the company links the transaction, such as by giving a special offer if you buy two flights together, then you should be covered.
A trick to help – pay the deposit by credit card and you're covered for the whole cost of an item or service
The law's specific on this, you get the protection for the whole cost of an item or service, even if you only pay for a part of it – even just 1p would count – on credit. The only condition is that what you're buying costs more than £100 and less than £30,000.
Therefore if you want protection: as long as it costs more than £100, pay for even a fraction on a credit card and you're protected.
What is NOT covered by Section 75?
As always with these things, a few exceptions escape the safety net. The first is anything to do with the purchase of land – this is controlled by regulation from the Financial Conduct Authority. But there are other exceptions, including...
Goods/services paid for by a secondary cardholder
If you have an additional card for a partner, child or friend and this card is used to pay for something you later need to claim for, you'll need to show the item/service provides some benefit to the primary cardholder to be covered.
So a family car or gift for the main cardholder would likely be OK. But a solo flight for the additional cardholder wouldn't be.
This isn't technically written into the legislation, but is based on a ruling (62/02) by the Financial Ombudsman in 2007.
Goods/services bought via intermediaries including travel agents, group-buying sites, PayPal and others
You're unlikely to be covered when payments are made to a company that isn't the one providing you with the product or service. In these cases, the credit card company usually says it didn't have a direct relationship with the supplier, so isn't equally liable.
If you stand your ground, it's possible to argue that the indirect relationship constitutes an 'arrangement to pay'. The Court of Appeal decided this was acceptable in 2006, but it's unlikely to be an easy task.
- Section 75 claims could be rejected if you've paid by Worldpay or Amazon Marketplace. One important area is when you've paid via an online processor such as Worldpay. Though these can have their own refund systems, they aren't as strong as the legal protection of Section 75.
There have also been recent cases where people buying goods on Amazon through Marketplace suppliers have been turned down for Section 75 claims by credit card companies. Some say these SHOULD be covered, but you may have to fight.
- You MAY be covered paying through PayPal but it depends on the seller and how you paid. With some sellers you might be covered by Section 75. For this, you need to look at whether the company you're buying from has a 'commercial entity agreement' with PayPal. If it does, and you paid by credit card, you may still be able to make a Section 75 claim. It's worth checking it out, but PayPal's buyer protection is likely to be simpler and faster. Leave Section 75 as a last resort if you can't get any joy from the seller or PayPal.
How you paid also matters – did you top up using a PayPal balance or simply pay via your linked card? Paying a retailer by credit card via PayPal, where the payment instrument is the credit card, Section 75 protection might also apply, although the Financial Ombudsman says it would depend on the individual circumstances of the transaction.
- However, if you make a payment to top up your PayPal account using a credit card and you pay from that PayPal account then section 75 will definitely not extend to whatever you purchased using your PayPal payment account – PayPal has developed their own set of protections but they are not the same protections
We pressed the ombudsman and it said that if your provider rejects your Section 75 claim, and you've paid by PayPal it will look at the individual circumstances in your case.
- Lloyds Bank was recently ordered by the Ombudsman to settle a two-year-old section 75 claim for one of our readers who paid through PayPal, but wasn't logged in to their PayPal account. Read the full news story.
Need all the ins and outs of paying by PayPal? For a more in-depth look at the implications of using PayPal, read our PayPal warning guide.
Goods/services paid for through a 'buy now, pay later' service such as Klarna & others
If you use a buy now, pay later service (BNPL) – such as Klarna, Clearpay or Laybuy – to buy something, you'll break the 'direct link' that's required for Section 75 protection. So it's unlikely you'll be able to call on your credit card provider to pursue a Section 75 refund if the item turns up faulty.
This is also the case if you use a BNPL service's 'pay now' option, such as Klarna's. This is because the 'direct link' is still broken. Read more about this in our 'Beware using Klarna's new 'pay now' service MSE News story.
Goods/services paid for indirectly via a credit card
Pay with a money transfer or withdraw cash on a credit card and, according to the Financial Ombudsman, Section 75 doesn't apply as it's an indirect form of payment.
One other point to make is the purchase of gift vouchers on a credit card may be counted as a cash payment, so you may be charged interest from the purchase date until the date you pay it off. Check your card's terms and pay off the card sooner if this applies to you.
Vouchers are covered by Section 75, assuming you use a credit/store card, spend over £100 AND buy the voucher directly from the goods/service supplier, not from a third-party supplier.
If the credit provider and the supplier are the SAME – for example, catalogue accounts
Section 75 relies on a three-party relationship between the consumer, the lender and the supplier. So if the supplier offers its own credit facility, the supplier and the lender are the same. This means you aren't covered under Section 75.
Thankfully, this situation's rare. You'd see it if, for example, you'd bought from the Next catalogue using its catalogue credit. In this case the supplier and the lender are the same, so you wouldn't have a Section 75 claim.
Most car finance is not provided by the dealership, but it's always worth checking, especially on large purchases that you've arranged credit for, whether Section 75 would apply if you ended up needing it.
If in doubt, use a credit card. This way you can be sure that there will still be a three-party relationship – supplier, lender and consumer – and therefore Section 75 cover.
Hire purchase agreements – car finance, some electrical goods etc.
Hire purchase (HP) is not covered under Section 75, though the redress process is similar. If you have a complaint about something you bought using HP, try to resolve it with the supplier. It has obligations under the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act to ensure that the goods are of satisfactory quality, and as described.
If you can't resolve the complaint with the supplier, try the finance provider (the company you're making repayments to). It's also bound under the same act to make things right with you, though what that actually means will depend on your complaint. If you're still not satisfied, you can take your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.
Important! Check that you actually have a hire purchase agreement. Although it's still common for car finance, most stores selling electricals now offer in-store instalment credit (which is covered by Section 75) rather than hire purchase.
Items costing exactly £100 or less on a credit card ... but there's a way around it
Section 75 only kicks in for credit purchases of more than £100 (so £100.01). It doesn't apply to anything you pay on a credit card costing less than that, and nor does it apply to anything – bought at any price – on a debit card or charge card (as these aren't considered credit purchases).
But where Section 75 doesn't apply, there's another rule that you may be able to fall back on. It's called chargeback, and it allows the card provider to reverse a payment you've made to a retailer if it agrees you've a legitimate complaint.
As a rule, act quickly with chargeback as there's a claim deadline. The rules set by Visa, Mastercard and American Express usually only give you 120 days to claim – and the clock normally starts ticking when you first notice a problem, but it depends on the situation. See our Chargeback guide for full info.
Possible reasons for using chargeback:
- The company has gone into administration.
- Quality of item – the goods were not as described or were defective.
- Non-delivery – the goods were not received as promised.
- Technical issue – such as a processing error by the bank.
- Clerical error – being charged multiple times or being billed for the incorrect amount.
- Fraud – you have been the victim of fraud and did not authorise the purchase.
However, it's important to know chargeback is part of Visa, Mastercard and Amex's internal rules and NOT a legal requirement, unlike Section 75.
MSE weekly email
FREE weekly MoneySaving email
For all the latest deals, guides and loopholes simply sign up today – it's spam-free!
How do I make a Section 75 claim?
It's generally easiest to try and settle any dispute with the retailer first. See if it's willing to offer a refund, replacement or repair (if this is possible).
Yet, the law makes clear that both the retailer and the credit card company are jointly responsible, so you don't have to go to the retailer first if it's difficult to do so.
If you are making a Section 75 claim, how you do it differs by card provider. Some will let you dispute a payment through your mobile banking app, or using their online chat services, while others will prefer that you call up, or fill in a claim form first. Check with your individual card provider to find out which is the best way to make a claim.
Make sure you're claiming from the card provider – so, for example, if you have an HSBC Mastercard, you'll need to contact HSBC about the Section 75 claim, not Mastercard.
Sadly, it's not always straightforward to make a claim...
- Sometimes the credit card company will ask you to get independent verification of a fault. If it asks for this, and approves the claim, it should also reimburse you for costs of getting the expert opinion. Most claims go ahead without this, but it's a possibility your lender will ask.
- Sometimes it will tell you it will try to reclaim the cash from the company in administration. You can simply answer: "Great news, I wish you the best of luck. However you are completely liable for my goods yourself, and I would like the full amount I'm entitled to please, regardless of that claim."
Luckily, if you do need to make a claim, and can't do it through your online banking or app, we've a tool to help...
Our free online tool helps draft a letter (which you can alter before sending), sends it, tells you when you've a response, keeps track of your complaint, and escalates it if necessary.
We do this using the complaints firm Resolver. We're working with Resolver on many projects to combine our expertise on how to complain with its cutting-edge technology.
How it works:
- Pick your card provider from the list. If you can’t find your provider listed there, Resolver says accounts can be added to the tool if you alert it via its website.
- Select your issue. Once you've chosen your card provider, you'll be presented with some drop down lists. Select the option that fits most closely with your complaint.
- Start your case. You’ll then be taken to a page with information about how Resolver can help with your claim, along with your rights, and the things you should bear in mind about using the service. If you’re happy with all this information, click the ‘Start your case now’ button.
- Provide further information about your claim, and some personal details. If you would like to, you'll be able to upload any evidence you’d like to use to strengthen your case. These can be attached to your claim letter. You could include things like photographs, email correspondence, and bank statements.
- Send your claim. Your claim letter will then be drafted for you. In many cases once you’ve checked it over and made any changes you want, you can send it through the Resolver platform.
Note: Resolver isn’t a complaints management firm. There’s no charge to use the service, and you’re in charge of complaint and progressing it – they’ll support you through the process, and help you escalate your claim at the right time too.
If you’d rather just send the letter yourself, we’ve also made a template that you can use as a general guide. Click the link below to download and edit:
If the card company turns you down, escalate your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman
If your credit provider won't help, has taken longer than eight weeks to deal with your complaint, or you're not satisfied with their response, escalate it to the Financial Ombudsman.
This is completely free and well worth doing. The ombudsman can look into complaints where you feel you've not been dealt with fairly and reasonably. This includes where a firm hasn't met good industry practice as well as the regulators' rules and the law of the land. This route is less formal than a court hearing, but the Ombudsman can still order firms to pay you compensation if it agrees with your case.
If you use the Resolver service above to help with your claim, it will notify you when it's the right time to escalate your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman, and help you do that.
If in doubt it's always worth making a claim
This information is based on conversations with eminent legal brains and Trading Standards. Yet this part of the law hasn't been tested in court so far.
If in doubt, it's always worth contacting your credit provider to make a claim. If you consider it to be a 'single item', make sure that's how you phrase it. Please report your experiences in the single item claims thread to help others.
Protection for £30k+ purchases
Section 75 covers purchases made on credit over £100 and up to £30,000. So a car costing £40,000 wouldn't be covered. Nor would a camera costing exactly £100 (but it would if it cost £100.01).
However, changes made in 2010 mean that certain credit agreements above £30,000 are now covered.
Items more than £30,000 are covered under Section 75a – but it's a bit more complicated
This protection comes under Section 75a and introduces an upper limit for claims of £60,260. The legislation gets complex for Section 75a, because for a purchase to be covered, the finance must be properly linked to an item (known as a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement) so the finance firm can see a clear relationship between the money and goods.
So, a £40,000 car wouldn't be covered if you'd used a credit card or personal loan as you could have used those to buy anything. A loan, specifically for the car, arranged through the dealership would be covered.
The other big difference is that under Section 75 you can take your complaint to the good/service provider OR to the credit provider, as they're both jointly and severally liable. But under Section 75a, you need to have unsuccessfully complained or tried to complain to the provider of the good or service (if they still exist) to make a claim to the credit provider.
Credit for land purchase or business borrowing isn't covered under either Section 75 or 75a.
MSE weekly email
FREE weekly MoneySaving email
For all the latest deals, guides and loopholes simply sign up today – it's spam-free!
Section 75 FAQs
Spotted out of date info/broken links? Email: brokenlink@moneysavingexpert.com
-
NS&I to increase the Premium Bond prize rate to 1.40% - here's all you need to know
24 May 2022![]()
NS&I will increase its Premium Bond prize fund rate, which is equivalent to a yearly interest rate, from 1% to 1.4% from 1 June. The odds of each £1 Premium Bond number winning a prize will also increase from 34,500 to one to 24,500 to one. -
Coronavirus travel rights
24 May 2022![]()
We've the latest on the testing and self-isolation rules for travellers visiting popular destinations abroad, plus full refund and insurance rights for overseas and UK travel. -
Amigo Loans borrowers move one step closer to being refunded after High Court approves redress scheme - here's all you need to know
23 May 2022![]()
A compensation plan put forward by Amigo Loans to return at least £112 million to borrowers it wrongly mis-sold high-interest loans to has today (23 May) been approved by the High Court. The move is a significant win for borrowers and follows a previous proposal that was rejected by the Court. -
Toy subscription service Whirli goes into administration - what it means for refunds and returns
23 May 2022![]()
Children's toy subscription service Whirli has gone into administration. The collapse affects around 10,500 customers. Here's what it means for your refund and return rights. -
Three's £2 a day roaming charges come into effect today – here's all you need to know
23 May 2022![]()
Three's £2 a day roaming charges come into effect from today (23 May) for holidaymakers who wish to use their normal monthly allowance in Europe. The change will effect new and upgrading pay monthly and Sim-only customers.
-
Martin Lewis: Got a cash ISA? You should probably ditch it
24 May 2022![]()
Press the rewind button and go way back to April 2015... Possibly on the telly in the corner of your living room, I was on-air at the time urging savers as usual to use their new tax-free cash ISA allowance – because 'money was nicer in an ISA'. But things changed in 2016. -
Martin Lewis: 'UO is just as important as UX: A tip for anyone developing their website or app'
6 May 2022![]()
I set up MoneySavingExpert.com nearly 20 years ago – when arguably the modern web was still in its infancy. With an abundance of self-belief (something I had too much of then, as I realise now) I decided not to read any books, or follow prevailing wisdom on how a site should operate – and just do it my way. -
Martin Lewis: Money and Mental Health charity 2021/22 – Covid & cost of living hell...
26 April 2022![]()
It's hard to believe the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute (MMHPI) charity is now six years old. As the chair of trustees, each year I write the foreword to its annual report – and today the 2021/22 report is out, so I thought I'd blog my formal chair's foreword here. -
Martin Lewis: What happened to my pledge to give £10m to charity – 2022 update (spoiler: it's now £20m)
11 April 2022![]()
Nearly a decade ago, in June 2012, MSE joined the MSM Group and I pledged £10m to go to charity. As that was a public pledge and I feel I've a duty of transparency, every year or two I bash out a blog report to explain where I'm up to, and who's got what money.
MSE tools & calculators
Clever ways to calculate your finances
