Former investors in nationalised lender Bradford & Bingley (B&B) should receive no compensation for their shares, the independent valuer of the stricken business has said.
The decision affects 935,000 shareholders in B&B, which saw its mortgage arm nationalised and its savings unit sold off to Spanish banking giant Santander in September 2008 during the financial crisis.
The move will be a bitter disappointment to investors but PricewaterhouseCoopers valuer Peter Clokey says he made his decision after weighing up "representations from a wide range of groups and individuals".
B&B shares closed at 20p each on the final day of trading before the nationalisation and break-up of the group.
The company - which listed on the London Stock Exchange in December 2000 - was previously one of Britain's best known building societies, formed from the 1964 merger between the Bradford Equitable Building Society and the Bingley Building Society.
'Theft'
The B&B Shareholders Action Group - which had previously said any valuation below 55p a share would be "tantamount to theft" - plans to appeal against the PwC decision.
Spokesman Richard Jennings says: "Peter Clokey has today delivered a damning verdict on the rights of UK shareholders. This is a very sad day, not just for B&B shareholders but UK shareholders in general."
Clokey decided B&B - which had seen £173 million flood out of the firm in the two days before nationalisation - would have fallen into administration, leaving nothing for shareholders.
He says the lender was reliant on the Bank of England special liquidity scheme (SLS) - which allowed riskier assets to be swapped for safe Treasury bonds - but the BoE denied access after the threat of a credit downgrade for the bonds it was using as collateral.
The B&B board considered the lender "was likely to have unacceptably low levels of liquidity within a matter of days" without SLS funding, Clokey's assessment said.
With other sources of funding drying up in panicked money markets, he concludes: "In the absence of the transfer order, B&B would ... have been unable to continue as a going concern and would have applied to court for an administration order before the transfer time."
Further reading/Key links
Investment guides: Share Buying, Discount Brokers
Best rates: Top Savings, Top Fixed Savings
Stay safe: Safe Savings
Have your say
This is an open discussion but the comments do not represent the views of MSE. We want everyone to enjoy using our site but spam, bullying and offensive comments will not be tolerated. Posts may be deleted and repeat offenders blocked at our discretion. Please contact fbteam@moneysavingexpert.com if you wish to report any comments.