MoneySavingExpert.com homepage
Cutting your costs, fighting your corner
Founder, Martin Lewis · Editor-in-Chief, Marcus Herbert
Search bar closed.
MSE News

Northern Rock told to refund 40,000 over incorrect loan documents

dv075050a
Press Association
Press Association
Editor
10 December 2014

More than 40,000 borrowers are in line to receive thousands of pounds in compensation following a High Court ruling over the wording of documents sent out by failed lender Northern Rock.

Northern Rock Asset Management (NRAM), the state-owned remnant of Northern Rock, will have to pay £258 million of taxpayer funds in refunded interest to 41,000 borrowers unless the decision is overturned.

The case relates to Northern Rock's 'Together Mortgage', which allowed customers to borrow up to 95% of the value of their home on a secured basis, as well as take out an unsecured loan of up to £30,000 (see MoneySavingExpert.com's Cheap Personal Loans guide for the best buys).

In 2012, NRAM had to pay out £270 million in refunded interest after the bank failed to make mandatory disclosures in customer letters since 2008 (see the Northern Rock pays £270m to 150,000 after cock-up MoneySavingExpert.com News story).

In today's case covering the period 1999 to 2008, it was determined that the bank made a similar error in documenting unsecured loans of between £25,000 and £30,000.

The bank failed to outline the initial loan on the customer statement, which was a requirement of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. However, because loans of more than £25,000 were not covered by the Act, NRAM had argued the omission should not lead to compensation.

The court ruled against the lender because in a separate error, it had stated on the forms that the £25,000-plus loans were covered by the Act.

NRAM, which is part of UK Asset Resolution, brought the case against itself to test whether customers were owed compensation after receiving 277 customer complaints about the issue.

UKAR chief executive Richard Banks says: "We are disappointed by the decision because no detriment has been suffered by customers.

"We are now considering the impact of the judgment and taking legal advice on whether to appeal. Customers do not need to act at this stage. If any redress becomes due, we will write to all those affected to advise on next steps."

Additional reporting by Helen Knapman.

MSE Forum

Northern Rock

Forum image
MSE Email icon 3 December 2024

For all the latest deals, guides and loopholes simply sign up today - it’s spam free!

The truth about credit scores
Martin's need-knows
Compare+ Home Insurance
New MSE tool
Christmas consumer rights
12 must-knows
5.18% easy-access savings
Up to £20,000
50p photocard delivered
From Card Factory
Christmas light running costs
We've crunched the numbers
Coupons: 'Free' £2 crisps
Plus £2 off pizza
Tools and calculators

Clever ways to calculate your finances

Find your odds of getting top cards
Find your odds for getting a cheap loan
Compare broadband, phone & TV deals
Compares thousands of mortgages
Eight calcs to help you work out the cost
We ensure you’re on the cheapest tariff